Skip to content

Mention Quarkus MCP servers, along side Spring.#34

Closed
edburns wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
azure-javaee:mention-quarkus-mcp
Closed

Mention Quarkus MCP servers, along side Spring.#34
edburns wants to merge 2 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
azure-javaee:mention-quarkus-mcp

Conversation

@edburns
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@edburns edburns commented Mar 7, 2025

modified: README.md

Mention the existence of Quarkus MCP servers, to supplement Spring.

Motivation and Context

Reduce 2nd order ignorance about Quarkus support for MCP.

How Has This Been Tested?

This change is documentation only.

Breaking Changes

This change is documentation only.

Types of changes

  • [ X] Documentation update

Checklist

  • [ X] I have read the MCP Documentation
  • [NA ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • [NA ] New and existing tests pass locally
  • [NA ] I have added appropriate error handling
  • [NA ] I have added or updated documentation as needed

See also modelcontextprotocol/servers#758 .

edburns added 2 commits March 7, 2025 15:44
… Spring.

modified:   README.md

Signed-off-by: Ed Burns <edburns@microsoft.com>
… Spring.

modified:   README.md

Signed-off-by: Ed Burns <edburns@microsoft.com>
@dsp-ant
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

dsp-ant commented Mar 26, 2025

I am happy to include Quarkus in the README, if it is based on the MCP Java SDK and relevant to the repository. Looking at it briefly, and correct me if i am wrong, it looks like it is a complete separate implementation that has no direct relation to the MCP Java SDK. I will close this PR for now, but feel free to reopen if the situation changes or if I was mistaken and it depends on the Java SDK. In the meantime,the quarkus team is welcomed to help developing and moving forward the Java SDK.

Reduce 2nd order ignorance about Quarkus support for MCP.

Please stay constructive.

@dsp-ant dsp-ant closed this Mar 26, 2025
@edburns
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

edburns commented Mar 31, 2025

You are correct, it is not based on the MCP Java SDK.

@dsp-ant wrote

Please stay constructive.

I meant no offense. 2nd order ignorance is not knowing that you don't know something, but you have a process for learing that you don't know that you don't know something. By referencing the Quarkus MCP project, I was attempting to reduce the reader's 2nd order ignorance to 1st order ignorance. Thanks for your consideration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants